We Get Bonds & Tax Credits.
We understand what is needed to assist lenders in making sure borrowers will qualify.
Tax Credit Finance and Bonds
Rosenberg Martin Greenberg’s Real Estate Finance Group has considerable experience representing lenders in structuring and documenting financing of construction and development projects involving multiple sources of financing, including transactions involving commercial real estate designated as certified historic structures.
In addition, attorneys in this group have represented lenders on mixed-use real estate development projects involving a variety of financing sources and unique methods of securing loans, including the use of:
- Federal Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits
- New Market Tax Credits
- Tax Increment Financing (“TIF Bonds”)
- other state and local funding options
Tax credit financing
Economic downturns and unfavorable credit market conditions in recent years have continued to generate intense interest in a wide range of alternative financing methods for capital projects. The team of tax credit finance attorneys at Rosenberg Martin Greenberg stand ready to represent lenders, investors and others wishing to utilize these opportunities as means to improve not just their own bottom lines, but also their communities.
Federal historic tax credits
The federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives program provides tangible benefits for developers by way of a 20 percent tax credit for the rehabilitation of certified historic structures, a 10 percent credit for rehabilitation of non-historic structures put into service prior to 1936, and other potential tax benefits for developers willing to grant historic preservation easements on or around assets slated for development.
Obtaining the benefits of these programs can be a complex undertaking, and therefore it is wise for lenders or developers to consult with attorneys experienced in assisting with such transactions. Toward that end, RMG attorneys can negotiate exit strategies, master leases, up-front agreement structuring and necessary partnership and operating agreements that ensure fulfillment of our clients' critical objectives.
New market tax credit programs
Another crucial method of facilitating development and economic growth during difficult financial times is known as the New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC). This vehicle is intended to boost capital in-flow to lower income rural and urban communities and businesses by offering tax benefits to private entities willing to invest in them. Investors can receive a substantial tax credit, but the necessary negotiations leading to a successful transaction can be complicated and highly detailed, making the help of seasoned tax professionals truly invaluable to investors, leverage lenders, community development organizations and business enterprises alike.
The attorneys of Rosenberg Martin Greenberg regularly serve as counsel for NMTC-involved transactions, providing:
- Guidance on transaction structuring, identifying available incentives and finance sources and risk aversion strategies
- Issuance of opinions for tax credit investors and other interested entities
- Negotiating, structuring and documenting all compliance requirements and credit provisions
- Consulting on state and federal reporting requirements
- Formation of community development enterprises and completion of all required NTMC allocation applications
- Documentation of loans and investments and coordination of transactions and necessary closings
Construction loan financing & tax exempt bonds
Rosenberg Martin Greenberg routinely represents parties to transactions involving taxable and tax-exempt bond financing throughout the Mid-Atlantic region, standing ready to serve as bond counsel, bond purchaser counsel and underwriter counsel in a range of construction contexts encompassing housing construction projects, stadium and theater construction, hospital expansions, downtown redevelopment initiatives and more. Whether offering stand-alone representation or as a supplement to existing in-house general counsel services, our team can render the comprehensive assistance developers and construction loan lenders seek when project stakes are high.
We at Rosenberg Martin Greenberg are committed to facilitating transactions that hold tremendous promise not just for developers, but for the entire region. We invite you to contact us to learn more about how we can help with your historic rehabilitation tax credit, tax increment financing, new market tax credit or other construction loan finance project in Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, DC or elsewhere in the Mid-Atlantic region.
Bonds and Tax Credits Team
The Latest from the Knowledge Center...
Many states, including Maryland and Pennsylvania, recognize the common law form of ownership of property as “tenants by the entireties” for both real and personal property, including bank accounts. Under that form of ownership, a husband and wife are a “marital unit” that is a different legal entity than the husband or the wife individually. …
Lawyers who represent debtors in bankruptcy cases, supported by rulings from many bankruptcy judges, have long taken the position that creditors with unsecured claims whose agreements with their debtors provide for payment of the creditors’ enforcement expenses, including attorneys’ fees, are not entitled to assert claims for such expenses in bankruptcy cases. This view has…
Date: January 17, 2019 | Authors: Brandon N. Mourges, Michael J. March The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) provided the most comprehensive update to the tax code in over two decades. Of the many changes the TCJA provided, Sections 1400Z-1 and 1400Z-2 of the IRC are of the most heavily discussed and analyzed by taxpayers and tax practitioners.…
Commercial lenders that originate asset-based lending (“ABL”) credit facilities are finding themselves in an increasingly competitive market. Large national banks grab the bulk of the multi-million dollar ABL credit line business. Lightly regulated non-bank ABLs serve smaller markets with loan facilities ranging from $3 million to $30 million. Community and regional banks seek to hold…
Lenders should have completed implementation of procedures for compliance with new regulations that become effective on May 11, 2018, informally known as the “Know Your Customer” requirements. Those regulations focus primarily on identifying the beneficial ownership of financial institution accounts. Lenders should not let those beneficial ownership regulations overshadow the new customer due diligence (CDD)…
Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Student Athletes’ Suit Seeking Federal Minimum Wage, But Concurrence Leaves Room For a Different Result in Future Cases
On December 5, 2016, the federal Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court’s dismissal of a suit brought by two former members of the University of Pennsylvania’s (“Penn”) women’s track and field team. The student athletes sued Penn, the NCAA, and more than 120 other NCAA Division I colleges and universities. The theory…
Oh What A Difference A Day Makes: Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Holds That Check Written Before Bankruptcy Filing, But Honored After Bankruptcy Is Post-Petition Transfer
“Transfers,” and when they occur, are important under the Bankruptcy Code for a number of reasons. Trustees may recover as a “preference” any “transfer…to of for the benefit of a creditor…for or on account of an antecedent debt…made within 90 days before the date of the filing of the petition…that enables such creditor to receive…
The bankruptcy system is facing a potential upheaval from an unlikely front: a patent dispute. The U.S. Supreme Court has heard oral arguments and is now considering the case Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, and its separation of powers issues could have a drastic effect on the operation of American…
In April 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court gave Congress a number of proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (FRBP). Congress approved those amendments, and they became effective on December 1, 2017. Some of the advantages in the new amendments go to consumers who declare bankruptcy in Federal Court. The lending and banking…
Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.: A Unanimous Supreme Court Opinion Leaves Unanswered Questions
On February 27, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc. to resolve conflicting Circuit Court interpretations of Bankruptcy Code Section 546(e). Although the Merit opinion is unanimous and appears straightforward on first reading, fertile grounds for future litigation remain. Section 546(e) is commonly referred…