We Get Non-Consolidation.

Our bankruptcy practitioners can issue non-consolidation opinions when needed to close.

 

 

 

Non-Consolidation Opinions

Rosenberg Martin Greenberg issues legal opinions, including non-consolidation opinions, related to commercial lending transactions. Whether required as part of a loan transaction that exceeds a designated dollar threshold or as a precursor to a structured finance or securitization deal, the issuance of a non-consolidation opinion letter by highly qualified counsel is often the sine qua non to achieving a final agreement. It is designed to reassure lenders that the borrower or debt issuer will remain separate from its originating entity and/or from the organization that services the relevant assets, in the event one of those entities seeks bankruptcy protection.

Few law firms are sufficiently qualified and familiar with the extremely technical structured finance and bankruptcy principles necessary to issue an opinion of this nature, despite the fact that they are indispensable to bringing such transactions to conclusion. The attorneys at Rosenberg Martin Greenberg possess the experience, training and analytical skills necessary to render non-consolidation opinions to those seeking to enter into complex agreements with lenders across the Mid-Atlantic region and beyond.

How a non-consolidation opinion letter works

Integral to the process of closing loan transactions in capital markets and other securitization agreements is the notion that the mortgaged assets be held by a single purpose entity, sometimes referred to as an “SPE.” Such an entity will be engaged in no business besides owning the property related to the loan being sought and will have no additional debts beside the loan amount and perhaps a minimal amount of trade debt. These entities may be corporations, business trusts, partnerships or limited liability companies. SPEs are created to establish that the success of the loan will be affected only by factors directly related to the mortgaged asset and nothing else.

The process of rendering a non-consolidation opinion involves exhaustive review of all questions and considerations underlying the proposed loan agreement. The attorney opinion letter provides a prospective lender with additional confidence in the SPE's capacity and willingness to remain separate and distinct from affiliates in all ways pertinent to the loan transaction.

Single Member Opinions and Authority to File Opinions

Often borrower’s counsel is requested to also issue “single member” and “authority to file” opinions in conjunction with a non-consolidation opinion.  Rosenberg Martin Greenberg also has experience is issuing such opinions.

Seasoned counsel for structured finance clients and commercial loan borrowers

Finding commercial lending counsel capable of drafting high level non-consolidation opinion letters is challenging. Hands-on experience and an in-depth understanding of securitization and structured finance agreements is absolutely necessary in cases where conventional lending arrangements will not suffice. Attorneys at Rosenberg Martin Greenberg have the requisite experience and are readily available to assist clients throughout the Mid-Atlantic area. Call to learn more about our legal services and how our firm can assist your business.

Non-Consolidation Opinions Team

The Latest from the Knowledge Center...

The ABL Collision Course

July 12, 2018

Commercial lenders that originate asset-based lending (“ABL”) credit facilities are finding themselves in an increasingly competitive market. Large national banks grab the bulk of the multi-million dollar ABL credit line business. Lightly regulated non-bank ABLs serve smaller markets with loan facilities ranging from $3 million to $30 million. Community and regional banks seek to hold…

Lender Compliance with New Customer Due Diligence Rules

July 12, 2018

Lenders should have completed implementation of procedures for compliance with new regulations that become effective on May 11, 2018, informally known as the “Know Your Customer” requirements. Those regulations focus primarily on identifying the beneficial ownership of financial institution accounts. Lenders should not let those beneficial ownership regulations overshadow the new customer due diligence (CDD)…

Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Student Athletes’ Suit Seeking Federal Minimum Wage, But Concurrence Leaves Room For a Different Result in Future Cases

July 11, 2018

On December 5, 2016, the federal Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court’s dismissal of a suit brought by two former members of the University of Pennsylvania’s (“Penn”) women’s track and field team.[1]  The student athletes sued Penn, the NCAA, and more than 120 other NCAA Division I colleges and universities.  The theory…

Oh What A Difference A Day Makes: Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Holds That Check Written Before Bankruptcy Filing, But Honored After Bankruptcy Is Post-Petition Transfer

April 19, 2018

“Transfers,” and when they occur, are important under the Bankruptcy Code for a number of reasons.  Trustees may recover as a “preference” any “transfer…to of for the benefit of a creditor…for or on account of an antecedent debt…made within 90 days before the date of the filing of the petition…that enables such creditor to receive…

Supreme Court Patent Case Could Affect Bankruptcy Court Authority

February 28, 2018

The bankruptcy system is facing a potential upheaval from an unlikely front: a patent dispute. The U.S. Supreme Court has heard oral arguments and is now considering the case Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, and its separation of powers issues could have a drastic effect on the operation of American…

Snapshot of the New Federal Bankruptcy Rules

February 28, 2018

In April 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court gave Congress a number of proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (FRBP). Congress approved those amendments, and they became effective on December 1, 2017. Some of the advantages in the new amendments go to consumers who declare bankruptcy in Federal Court. The lending and banking…

Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.: A Unanimous Supreme Court Opinion Leaves Unanswered Questions

February 28, 2018

On February 27, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc. to resolve conflicting Circuit Court interpretations of Bankruptcy Code Section 546(e).  Although the Merit opinion is unanimous and appears straightforward on first reading, fertile grounds for future litigation remain. Section 546(e) is commonly referred…

Live By The Choice of Law Provision, Die By The Choice of Law Provision

January 4, 2018

Many parties, particularly large companies operating in multiple states, include provisions in their standard contract forms specifying that the law of a particular state governs the transaction.  The choice of applicable law is generally law with which the company is familiar, such as the law of the state where its headquarters is located, or law…

Trends in Commercial and Residential Real Estate

January 4, 2018

An uncertain political and economic environment may increase the perceived risk that lenders take when they loan funds against real estate. Identifying developing trends in commercial real estate can help a lender manage its risk and underwrite loans that are secured by properties that will hold or increase in value. The lending and banking attorneys…

Senate Action Reverses CFPB Rule, Re-Opens Door to Arbitration Clauses

January 4, 2018

On October 23, 2017, the U.S. Senate voted by a narrow margin to repeal the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) July limit on arbitration clauses in consumer financial contracts. The repeal of the rule effectively limits the institution of class action lawsuits in consumer financial disputes and allows banks and other financial institutions to elect…