Skip to content

J. Teigen Hall - Associate

About Teigen

Teigen joined the firm as an associate attorney in RMG’s litigation group in May 2017. His civil litigation practice involves business and corporate law, bankruptcy and creditors rights, commercial law, construction law, insurance law, employment law, and personal injury.

In his construction practice, Teigen represents owners, general contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and design professionals, and municipalities in all areas of construction, including contract drafting and negotiation, pre-litigation dispute resolution, and all phases of civil litigation. He has experience handling complex commercial construction disputes, including mechanics’ liens, prompt payment issues, impact and delay claim analysis, construction defects, and warranty issues on public and private projects.

In his bankruptcy and creditors’ rights practice, Teigen represents banks, financial institutions and commercial lenders in all phases of the workout and debt restructuring process, including negotiating and documenting debt agreements, litigation, real estate foreclosure sales, sales pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code, judgment enforcement, and general debt recovery.

Teigen is a member of the Maryland State Bar Association, the Bar Association of Baltimore City, and the Bar Association of Baltimore County. He currently serves as Co-Chair of the Construction Liability Subcommittee of the Maryland Defense Counsel, Inc. and previously served as a judicial clerk to the Honorable J. Barry Hughes of the Circuit Court for Carroll County. Teigen is licensed to practice in Maryland and the District of Columbia.

education

  • University of Baltimore School of Law (J.D., 2008)
  • Lehigh University (B.A., 2004)

bar admissions

  • Maryland
  • District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court, District of Maryland
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

 

The Latest from the Knowledge Center...

Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLP Elects Two New Partners

July 1, 2019

Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLP is pleased to announce the election of two of its attorneys, Adam Ruther and Justin A. Williams, as partners of the firm, effective July 1, 2019. Justin represents developers, as well as commercial and industrial property owners in land use, zoning, entitlements, building construction regulation, and liquor licensing matters. He sits on…

Rosenberg Martin Greenberg Launches Criminal Defense and Investigations Microsite

June 27, 2019

Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLP, a 40-attorney law firm headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland with offices in Maryland, Delaware, New York and Washington, D.C. is pleased to announce the launch of its Criminal Defense and Investigations microsite.  The Criminal Defense and Investigations team is comprised of former prosecutors and investigators, as well as seasoned attorneys with significant…

New Legislation Proposed to Lower Threshold for Projects to Qualify for Baltimore City’s High-Performance Market-Rate Rental Housing Tax Credit

June 25, 2019

By: Justin Williams On May 9th, Councilman Bill Henry introduced CCB #19-389, which proposes to modify the number of rental units required to qualify a multi-family dwelling project for the City’s High-Performance Market-Rate Rental Housing Tax Credit (the “Tax Credit”) from 20 units to 10 units.  First enacted in 2014, the Tax Credit was aimed…

Just Say No…To The Condemning Authority’s First Offer, That Is.

June 11, 2019

Public infrastructure projects are on the rise, from new transit systems to comprehensive highway renovations and everything in between.  Behind the scenes, some governmental body is fast at work acquiring private land along the project route by power of eminent domain.  This harsh reality is endlessly vexing to anyone who stands to lose land to…

In re: Muhs “Willful and Malicious” Does Not Mean “Willful and Malicious”

May 30, 2019

May 30, 2019 | William L. Hallam, Creditors’ Rights In In re Muhs, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit was called upon to decide whether “the meaning of ‘willful and malicious’ under Alaska law is identical to the meaning of ‘willful and malicious’ under the Bankruptcy Code.”  In its May 8, 2019…

Maryland Governor Signs into Law New Statute Assisting Commercial Lenders Seeking to Obtain Receiverships over Borrowers and/or Real Estate Collateral

May 28, 2019

There is good news for commercial lenders in Maryland seeking the appointment of a receiver over a borrower or solely over real estate collateral.  On  April 30, 2019, Governor Hogan signed into law HB 1065, which creates an entirely new set of rules when a commercial lender wishes to have a receiver appointed as one…

Demystifying Life Estate Deeds in Maryland

May 9, 2019

By Craig A. Enck, Esq., Partner, Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLP and Richard (Ricky) Adams, Associate, Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLP In Maryland, you can make a beneficiary designation on your real property. This type of transaction is called a Life Estate Deed. It can be a very useful tool to avoid probate while also preserving tax…

Maryland Bankruptcy Court Determines Priority of Homeowner Association Fees versus Mortgage Lender’s Deed of Trust

May 8, 2019

In 2017, the Maryland Court of Appeals in the case of Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. v. Saddlebrook West Utility Company, 455 Md. 313 (2017) (“Saddlebrook”) held that a provision in a recorded declaration by a utility that purported to create a lien to secure payment of an annual assessment to cover the construction of water…

In re: Titus – Fraudulent Conveyance Law Defeats Exemption Rights

March 7, 2019

Many states, including Maryland and Pennsylvania, recognize the common law form of ownership of property as “tenants by the entireties” for both real and personal property, including bank accounts.  Under that form of ownership, a husband and wife are a “marital unit” that is a different legal entity than the husband or the wife individually. …

Fourth Circuit Allows Unsecured Creditors to Assert Claims for Attorneys’ Fees In Bankruptcy Cases

February 13, 2019

Lawyers who represent debtors in bankruptcy cases, supported by rulings from many bankruptcy judges, have long taken the position that creditors with unsecured claims whose agreements with their debtors provide for payment of the creditors’ enforcement expenses, including attorneys’ fees, are not entitled to assert claims for such expenses in bankruptcy cases.  This view has…