We Get Consumer Claims.
Our attorneys have successfully defended numerous consumer class actions.
Class Action and Consumer Litigation Defense
Rosenberg Martin Greenberg defends banks, creditors, and financial institutions in both individual and class-action lawsuits brought by consumers who have asserted violations of statutory and regulatory matters. RMG attorneys have successfully defended such claims in state and federal trial courts, as well as in in arbitration and mediation.
Experienced class action defense
Class-action lawsuits by nature are large, complex, and unwieldy. With millions of dollars at stake, a successful defense against these claims can be crucial to the defendant company’s survival. It is important that the firm you choose to defend against these matters has the resources to produce results in the face of countless challenges.
Throughout our 30 year history, we have defended class action lawsuits on grounds including, but not limited to:
- False advertising
- Unjust enrichment
- Breach of contract
- Pension disputes
- Consumer loan agreements
- Deceptive business practices
- Sale of ancillary financial services products
Defending against consumer claims
Consumer claims often have the advantage of clearly-worded federal law. Our firm has ample experience defending against claims based on alleged violations of federal consumer protection statutes including:
- Fair Housing Act (FHA)
- Truth in Lending Act (TILA)
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
- Fair Credit Reporting Transactions Act (FCRA)
- Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA)
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)
- The Maryland Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
- The Maryland Consumer Protection Act (MCPA)
- The Maryland Secondary Mortgage Loan Law (SMLL)
- The Maryland Retail Installment Sales Act (RISA)
- The Maryland Credit Grantor Closed End Credit Provisions (CLEC)
- The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)
- The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
- The Maryland Telephone Consumer Protection Act (MTCPA)
- The Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act (MCDCA)
Experienced Consumer Litigation Defense
Successful class action and consumer litigation defense depends largely on the firm chosen. Defendants will want to carefully consider the reputation of the law firm, particularly with regard to:
- Track Record
- Local Ties
- Legal acumen
At Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, we stand by our reputation on all fronts. We are known for dispensing with large class action consumer claims aggressively and swiftly. Threshold issues such as class certification, dismissal of class representatives, and a meaningful negotiation can stop a class action dead in its tracks. If the class is certified, we have the resources to manage every stage of litigation from discovery and pretrial motions to jury verdict and appeals.
Success and experience form the cornerstone of any elite law firm which the high-stakes nature of a large class-action suit demands. Trust the Class Action Defense Division of RMG to defend your case. We will explore every possible path to success including creative settlement structuring, consolidation of discovery requests, electronic compliance, and application of procedural rules to help you achieve the best possible result relative to economic impact on your business while the case is pending.
Learn more about what makes our firm so well-suited to successfully defend your company against any consumer claim or class action lawsuit. Call today or schedule a consultation in any of our local offices.
Defending Consumer Claims and Class Actions Team
The Latest from the Knowledge Center...
Commercial lenders that originate asset-based lending (“ABL”) credit facilities are finding themselves in an increasingly competitive market. Large national banks grab the bulk of the multi-million dollar ABL credit line business. Lightly regulated non-bank ABLs serve smaller markets with loan facilities ranging from $3 million to $30 million. Community and regional banks seek to hold…
Lenders should have completed implementation of procedures for compliance with new regulations that become effective on May 11, 2018, informally known as the “Know Your Customer” requirements. Those regulations focus primarily on identifying the beneficial ownership of financial institution accounts. Lenders should not let those beneficial ownership regulations overshadow the new customer due diligence (CDD)…
Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Student Athletes’ Suit Seeking Federal Minimum Wage, But Concurrence Leaves Room For a Different Result in Future Cases
On December 5, 2016, the federal Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court’s dismissal of a suit brought by two former members of the University of Pennsylvania’s (“Penn”) women’s track and field team. The student athletes sued Penn, the NCAA, and more than 120 other NCAA Division I colleges and universities. The theory…
Oh What A Difference A Day Makes: Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Holds That Check Written Before Bankruptcy Filing, But Honored After Bankruptcy Is Post-Petition Transfer
“Transfers,” and when they occur, are important under the Bankruptcy Code for a number of reasons. Trustees may recover as a “preference” any “transfer…to of for the benefit of a creditor…for or on account of an antecedent debt…made within 90 days before the date of the filing of the petition…that enables such creditor to receive…
The bankruptcy system is facing a potential upheaval from an unlikely front: a patent dispute. The U.S. Supreme Court has heard oral arguments and is now considering the case Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, and its separation of powers issues could have a drastic effect on the operation of American…
In April 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court gave Congress a number of proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (FRBP). Congress approved those amendments, and they became effective on December 1, 2017. Some of the advantages in the new amendments go to consumers who declare bankruptcy in Federal Court. The lending and banking…
Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.: A Unanimous Supreme Court Opinion Leaves Unanswered Questions
On February 27, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc. to resolve conflicting Circuit Court interpretations of Bankruptcy Code Section 546(e). Although the Merit opinion is unanimous and appears straightforward on first reading, fertile grounds for future litigation remain. Section 546(e) is commonly referred…
Many parties, particularly large companies operating in multiple states, include provisions in their standard contract forms specifying that the law of a particular state governs the transaction. The choice of applicable law is generally law with which the company is familiar, such as the law of the state where its headquarters is located, or law…
An uncertain political and economic environment may increase the perceived risk that lenders take when they loan funds against real estate. Identifying developing trends in commercial real estate can help a lender manage its risk and underwrite loans that are secured by properties that will hold or increase in value. The lending and banking attorneys…
On October 23, 2017, the U.S. Senate voted by a narrow margin to repeal the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) July limit on arbitration clauses in consumer financial contracts. The repeal of the rule effectively limits the institution of class action lawsuits in consumer financial disputes and allows banks and other financial institutions to elect…