We Get Commercial Litigation.
We have extensive experience representing lenders as both plaintiffs and defendants.
Commercial Litigation Attorneys
Rosenberg Martin Greenberg is well-versed in complex commercial litigation matters, providing clients the focus, efficiency and results that come from over 30 years experience in the field. We are able to meet client demands by leveraging a cross-disciplinary network of business and corporate litigation specialists, skilled paralegals and dedicated research experts. Using these valuable resources, our commercial attorneys can successfully manage complex commercial disputes of virtually any scope. By partnering with RMG, clients are assured top-tier ligation skills that are cost-effective and meticulously crafted to protect business assets.
Each commercial litigation attorney at RMG has handled a wide range of corporate law disputes. We represent lenders, creditors, debtors, asset sellers, landlords, property purchasers, credit unions, banks, creditor committees and small businesses.
Work with an Experienced Corporate Attorney
RMG corporate lawyers represents clients from both the plaintiff’s and the defendant’s sides.
On behalf of creditors, we have prosecuted countless claims including:
- Collection actions
- Confess judgment actions
- Actions seeking injunctive relief
- Replevin actions
- Attachments and levies
- Suits for the appointment of a receiver
Our attorneys have represented lenders as plaintiffs and defendants in actions for:
- Breach of contract
- Federal and state-law statutory violations
We have also defended numerous lender liability actions. Our wealth of experience in handling these types of matters means effective and efficient service, with less billed time researching legal issues.
Full service commercial litigation
Commercial litigation spans a broad range of matters arising under state and federal law including contract disputes, non-compete agreements, antitrust laws, shareholder disputes, restrictive covenants, business dissolution, unfair competition, foreclosure, business torts, debt collections and securities.
Our attorneys have substantial experience in commercial class action disputes, and represent clients in other matters involving:
- Bankruptcy litigation, including complaints to determine dischargeability, relief from stay, objections to exemptions, use of cash collateral and objections to plan confirmation
- Commercial loan transactions
- UCC enforcement and litigation
- Loan sales
RMG also has significant experience in prosecuting and defending commercial litigation claims in federal courts throughout the Mid-Atlantic region, providing strategic counsel in a broad spectrum of commercial matters which are in federal court either due to diversity or federal question jurisdiction.
Effective commercial dispute resolution
Rosenberg, Martin & Greenberg has cultivated a reputation for:
- Personalized, attentive service
- Creative solutions for complex needs
- Cost-effective strategies that save time and money
- Extensive courtroom experience
We serve our clients to reach the best possible outcome in their complex commercial litigation matter whether that course of action is through a negotiated settlement, trial, or some form of alternative dispute resolution including arbitration and mediation.
RMG attorneys work diligently to resolve each case efficiently, with due consideration of your long-range goals. To serve clients more conveniently, Rosenberg Martin Greenberg, LLP has law offices in Baltimore and Annapolis, Maryland as well as Wilmington, Delaware.
The Latest from the Knowledge Center...
Commercial lenders that originate asset-based lending (“ABL”) credit facilities are finding themselves in an increasingly competitive market. Large national banks grab the bulk of the multi-million dollar ABL credit line business. Lightly regulated non-bank ABLs serve smaller markets with loan facilities ranging from $3 million to $30 million. Community and regional banks seek to hold…
Lenders should have completed implementation of procedures for compliance with new regulations that become effective on May 11, 2018, informally known as the “Know Your Customer” requirements. Those regulations focus primarily on identifying the beneficial ownership of financial institution accounts. Lenders should not let those beneficial ownership regulations overshadow the new customer due diligence (CDD)…
Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Student Athletes’ Suit Seeking Federal Minimum Wage, But Concurrence Leaves Room For a Different Result in Future Cases
On December 5, 2016, the federal Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court’s dismissal of a suit brought by two former members of the University of Pennsylvania’s (“Penn”) women’s track and field team. The student athletes sued Penn, the NCAA, and more than 120 other NCAA Division I colleges and universities. The theory…
Oh What A Difference A Day Makes: Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Holds That Check Written Before Bankruptcy Filing, But Honored After Bankruptcy Is Post-Petition Transfer
“Transfers,” and when they occur, are important under the Bankruptcy Code for a number of reasons. Trustees may recover as a “preference” any “transfer…to of for the benefit of a creditor…for or on account of an antecedent debt…made within 90 days before the date of the filing of the petition…that enables such creditor to receive…
The bankruptcy system is facing a potential upheaval from an unlikely front: a patent dispute. The U.S. Supreme Court has heard oral arguments and is now considering the case Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, and its separation of powers issues could have a drastic effect on the operation of American…
In April 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court gave Congress a number of proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (FRBP). Congress approved those amendments, and they became effective on December 1, 2017. Some of the advantages in the new amendments go to consumers who declare bankruptcy in Federal Court. The lending and banking…
Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.: A Unanimous Supreme Court Opinion Leaves Unanswered Questions
On February 27, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc. to resolve conflicting Circuit Court interpretations of Bankruptcy Code Section 546(e). Although the Merit opinion is unanimous and appears straightforward on first reading, fertile grounds for future litigation remain. Section 546(e) is commonly referred…
Many parties, particularly large companies operating in multiple states, include provisions in their standard contract forms specifying that the law of a particular state governs the transaction. The choice of applicable law is generally law with which the company is familiar, such as the law of the state where its headquarters is located, or law…
An uncertain political and economic environment may increase the perceived risk that lenders take when they loan funds against real estate. Identifying developing trends in commercial real estate can help a lender manage its risk and underwrite loans that are secured by properties that will hold or increase in value. The lending and banking attorneys…
On October 23, 2017, the U.S. Senate voted by a narrow margin to repeal the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) July limit on arbitration clauses in consumer financial contracts. The repeal of the rule effectively limits the institution of class action lawsuits in consumer financial disputes and allows banks and other financial institutions to elect…